Tuesday, September 08, 2009

Hypocrisy over his nanny state

ON 3AW THIS MORNING Brumby pulls out the " You don't want a Nanny state, do you? " to justify his careless support for more gambling tables at Crown.
Is he fair dinkum ABOUT DEALING WITH ALL THE NANNIES in his State service ?
1 Bureaucrat SAYS yes , WHILE 100'S ARE PAID TO SAY no, no no.... TO a simple question. Can I cut here ? A process THAT HAS LITTLE onground CREDIBILITY ANYWHERE IN THE STATE . It would be rational to keep these nannies if they weren't just nuisance value . Some one has to tell us how to behave --it seems?
More important than hospital beds and ambos?

I wonder what the highly venerated Father Bob Maguire would be saying about the nanny state; the proportion of hindrance,to the proportion of real help in practice? new ideas come at a cost- whose lifelines does Labor really support ?To what extent is Labor caretaking or risk taking in its expenditure? !!
The premier also ducks for cover over failing alternative energy ideas ( the solar investment in NW victoria) - "he can't be blamed for supporting all the incentives from Labor"???; these wacky ideas about how to change the world in one term of office."We didn't encourage people to put money into that, did we? " - our advice is free ( apart from the ads ) ....but didn't you read the fine print ?
No careers there either , just short term jobs for people to drive around and learn about carbon trading schemes and higher cost everything; bustrips that have no bus stops yet ! Nanny type jobs where you just sit and do what you are told ! If only the nannies could speak

Make it easy for some, and impossible for others .Why labor be keep these nannies if they aren't more than just nuisance value . Some one has to tell us how to behave it seems --according to New Labor.








.